Economic
Systems
For those of us living in Canada
at the beginning of the 21st century it is easy to assume
that the economic system in which we find ourselves is the
only economic system there is - that all peoples everywhere
are using it and have always used it. An economic system is
a way of structuring an economy to reflect the values, assumptions,
and goals of a particular culture. Much of the world today
operates out of a market economic system. Market economists
believe that the market is sufficient to serve all aspects
of human life. But there are other ways of structuring an
economy and economic systems that recognize that not all values
have a market price.
Let's look at some different kinds
of economies:
Originally all peoples on the earth
lived in what we now call subsistence economies, described
by Indian Eco-feminist Vandana Shiva as economies in which
you "satisfy basic needs through self-provisioning."1
Instead of relying on money, subsistence economies depend
on the riches of the natural world. People grow food, fish,
and hunt to satisfy hunger, they build their own houses from
natural materials, and they drink from the rivers and streams.
Because they live intimately with nature, people living in
subsistence economies are more able to view the benefits of
respecting nature instead of exploiting it. They harvest plants
and eat animals but they also plant new seeds and encourage
animals to reproduce. They create little waste and they produce
only what they need for a given period instead of storing
things up. A subsistence economy depends on nature to reproduce
itself as well as human beings working in partnership with
nature to ensure that plants, animals, and humans all survive.
Within a subsistence economy, people value cooperation with
nature and with each other.
Today, most economic systems are dominated
by the market,
by which market refers to the exchange (buying and selling)
of goods and services. But a market economy isn't about simple
exchange. Rather, it's about making money, earning capital,
expansion, and most importantly growth. Market economies depend
just as heavily on the natural world as do subsistence economies,
only this dependence is ignored. Economics, or a system of
sharing limited resources, is really just one aspect of human
existence but in a market economy, economics becomes more
important than everything else. Health, the environment, community
- all of the physical, social, religious, and emotional aspects
of our lives are subsumed or taken over by the economic aspects
of our lives. The economy becomes not an aspect of culture
but culture itself. US President George W. Bush recently rejected
the Kyoto Protocol saying it was "bad for the economy," meaning
it will get in the way of making money. Good for health, good
for the environment, good for people, none of these are good
enough reasons. Economist E.F. Schumacher says that in a market
economy, "Anything that is found to be an impediment to economic
growth is a shameful thing, and if people cling to it, they
are thought of as either saboteurs or fools."2
Economic growth is measured simply in terms of money and it
is the accumulation of money which is most valued. This focus
on accumulation leads to short-term thinking. A forest is
worth only the price paid for the trees once they are cut
down, not the benefits it will provide to the environment
and humanity for the next 10 or 100 or 1000 years.
When people talk about the Western
economy they are referring to the market economy
because that is how most people living in the western countries
like Canada and the rest of the Americas as well as Western
Europe, understand the economy. Unfortunately, these countries
are working hard to force this system onto the rest of the
world.
A command economy is an economy in
which production is in the hands of the state rather than
the hands of private enterprises. It is similar to a market
economy in that the goal is growth and the dependence on the
natural world is mostly ignored. However, there are some significant
differences between market and command economies. A typical
market economy is a Capitalist economy,
an economy which emphasizes the expansion of capital. In a
capitalist economy the means of production are controlled
privately. This means that products are produced by individual
business as opposed to publicly-owned institutions like governments.
People who advocate for a capitalist economy argue that the
competition that results when many individuals or corporations
produce the same or a similar product leads to the creation
of the best (and cheapest) products. However, opponents argue
that when private individuals produce a product or service
as opposed to a government, their primary motivation is to
make money and to sell as much as possible. Governments on
the other hand are motivated to provide services to their
citizens. Therefore in a command economy the means of production
are controlled by the government. The goal is not expansion
of capital, to sell as much as possible, but rather to provide
a service for citizens of the state. A typical command economy
is a Socialist economy
where governments work towards economic equality for all as
opposed to just a few. Socialist economies value equality
and equity of distribution.
There have been and still are command
economies in the world. China and Cuba are two examples. Many
people argue that they haven't worked well and have led to
poor products and poor countries. Unfortunately, countries
that have strived to create more socialist economies have
been faced with much prejudice from countries with capitalist
market economic systems. Socialist economies faced and continue
to face trade boycotts cutting off from the rest of the world.
For many years they traded with each other but after the collapse
of socialism in Eastern Europe, Socialist economies like Cuba
had few countries to trade with, so indeed many of these countries
have become quite poor.
Canada's economy is primarily a market
economy though it has some features of a socialist economy.
This makes it a Mixed economy.
Even though much of the means of production in Canada is controlled
privately, not all of it is. Governments are still in charge
of health care, building most roads, delivering mail, and
printing money. These are activities that are not meant to
be income-generating but rather to provide services for the
citizens of Canada. However, in recent years many of these
public services are threatened by privatization. One example
is MTS (Manitoba Telecom Services Inc.) which was public but
is now private.
Many people have come to see that
the typical economic systems described above are bad for the
living world. While a market system may give us lots of money
and a command economy may attempt to divide that money up
more equally among people, neither system recognizes its dependence
on the natural world. As well, the goal of both systems is
growth rather than health and well-being of the environment
and humanity. Green economics advocates a transformation of
the economy so that, "markets express social and ecological
values."3 A green
economy pays attention to the effect of economic policy on
all peoples and the environment, recognizing the dependence
of all of human life on the natural world. It values most
highly ecological health, the source of all economic possibilities.
For more information on green economies visit Green
Economics.
Other people have come to see that
the natural world is unable to sustain a market economy which
continually encourages growth and expansion and the natural
world is unable to sustain this. Sustenance economies are
a kind of return to a subsistence economy in which humans
produce and reproduce wealth in partnership with nature.4
A sustenance economy is an economics of survival rather than
an economics of overconsumption encouraged by a market-based
economy. A sustenance economy allows us to pay attention to
the huge inequalities that exist in our world. For example,
we who live in the world's highest-income countries consume
80% of the world's resources even though we only represent
20% of the world's people. In contrast, the bottom 20% in
the lowest-income countries consume less than 10% of world
resources.5 Sustenance
economies encourage us to use our fair share of resources,
to replenish what we use, and to value restraint and frugality.
Another criticism that has been made
of money-based economies like market and command economies
is their lack of recognition of unpaid work. In response to
this gap sustainable development consultant Hazel Henderson
developed the idea of the Love economy which she describes
as the "50 percent of all useful products and services in
even industrial societies which are unpaid and largely produced
by womenÄincluding volunteering, caring for the young, old
and sick, household management, do-it-yourself housing, food-growing,
and community service."6
Henderson points out that the UN Human Development Index estimates
the value of unpaid work to be $16 trillion, all of which
is missing from the GDP of all countries. This half of all
human activity is not merely a hidden part of the economy,
it is also the basis of the monetary economy. A Love economy
values the work of production, reproduction, and caring for
human life alongside the natural world as the foundation on
which the rest of the economy functions.
The chart below shows some of the
features of the different economies we have discussed. If
you were designing an economic system what would be the key
features of your economy? What would you use as currency?
How would you ensure equitable distribution?
Economic Systems
| Economy |
Currency |
Raw Material |
Primary Goal |
for what Purpose |
Structure |
| Subsistence |
none |
the
natural world |
sustenance
of human life |
so
that we may all live and continue to live |
humans
working in partnership with nature |
| Market |
money |
material
goods and human labour |
growth,
consumption,
production,
expansion |
satisfaction
of individual needs |
decisions
left to individual producers and consumers |
|
- Capitalist |
|
|
|
individual
freedom |
production
controlled privately |
|
- Socialist (Command) |
|
|
|
social
equality |
production
controlled by state |
| Green |
money
though merely as a tool not as an end in itself |
the
natural world |
to
maintain the ecosystem |
so
that humans and nature can continue to live together on
this planet |
policies
that support life |
| Sustenance |
money;
perhaps local currencies |
the
natural world |
sustenance
of life |
so
that we may all live and share equally |
humans
working in partnership with nature and each other |
| Love |
bonds
between humans |
human
labour |
care
of each other |
preserving
relationships between and among people and the natural
world |
based
on relationships |
|